Skip to main content

Why hospital IT managers are a block for innovation




We all have this image in our head of an IT guy who surrounds himself with technology, obsessively try out every new gadget, and keep mentioning all kinds of weird acronyms that distance him from society.

When I sat the other day in front of the IT manager of a big hospital while he was chewing a gum, I can't help thinking how far is that image of the IT guy from the person who was sitting in front of me. 

In contrast to that image in our head the IT manager main concern is keeping the lights on. An IT manager who experienced an unscheduled downtime in one of the hospital mission critical systems, like many of them did, surely got his priorities straight after that event. The worst nightmare of an IT manager is to stand first thing in the morning in front of the CEO and to explain why the hospital network was hacked during the night. With such heavy responsibility laying on their heads innovation does not even get into the top three in their priority list.

That is all completely fine and understood. What is problematic however is that often the IT department get to be in charge of innovation just because innovative products tend to deal with technology, and the IT manager is the first stop to "pass" for introducing new technology to the hospital.

For the IT manager an innovative product is another product that he will have to maintain. His incentive plan does not include rewards for introducing new technologies and so as most people he will not be keen on taking additional work without a reward. Innovative products tend to use cutting edge infrastructure which requires the IT to get their heads around and learn how to maintain, in paradox the less innovative the product is the better it is for the IT department.

That misconception between the two images is what leads all hospital workers, from clinicians to executives, to turn to the IT manager when being introduced to an innovative product. Hospital IT managers usually do not have the skills to fully grasp the value of the systems they are asked to evaluate, and so as a result they tend to shift the discussion to subjects from their domain, like security, privacy, redundancy, authentication, interoperability, compliance, and other boring stuff that the hi-tech industry has found many ways to solve.
Too often the voice of the IT manager is too vocal in the conversation and clinicians and even C-level executives are reluctant to confront his or her opinion. 

A healthy organization must know to balance all voices and reward the individuals who prompt innovation and progress. Skepticism should be challenged and lack of motivation to take additional responsibilities is not a quality to be proud of.

But if you want a more practical advice it is this: instead of being the first, keep the IT manager the last person you consult with about introducing innovation. After all, you can't let the zoo keeper lead a herd of running horses...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FHIR Status Check

 More than 2 years have past since I wrote my article  on the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR®) standard and it’s time to do a quick status check and revisit the predictions I made back then. The FHIR standard continues the strong trajectory of adoption and is now used across the globe. The application programming interface (i.e. the FHIR API) is available in most major EHR systems today. According to the US Office of the National Coordinator Health Information Technology an estimated 85% of hospitals have FHIR in their systems. The NHS has been quick to adopt FHIR and the adoption curve in the UK is high. The NPfIT (NHS Care Record Service) HL7 V3 interfaces are being redeveloped in FHIR®, and new NHS specifications such as the CareConnect standard for secured Transfer of Care  are being specified in FHIR® by default. Despite the industry enthusiasm about the potential of FHIR still the old and faithful HL7 v2 remains the predominant interoperability sta...

Get ready for the invasion of the healthcare bots

Everywhere I go lately I hear people chatting about chatbots. It seems that every health organization is preparing to launch a chatbot service or at least has it on their roadmap. Once I noticed this trend, I keep asking the people I meet about their "bot strategy" and thus having my own small contribution to the trend. There are countless cases where a digital personal assistant or a chatbot could help physicians, nurses, patients or their families. From assistance in simple routine tasks like finding a doctor or scheduling an appointment, to better organization of patient pathways, medication management, help in emergency situation and offering a solution for simpler medical issues. The general idea behind the buzz is that in the future, these talking or texting smart algorithms might become the first contact point for primary care. Patients will not get in touch with caregivers directly for health questions but will turn to chatbots first. Only in case the bot can ...

Your Hospital on FHIR

As a technologist, I am always skeptical when hearing about a brand new technology that is going to solve all of our current problems. I feel it is my responsibility to warn people about these types of promises. Claims of “solving all healthcare information exchange (HIE) problems” are often being made about the emerging HL7 FHIR standard. According to Gartner’s hype cycle, the standard is at the “Peak of Inflated Expectations,” which I view as a stage where wishful thinking fills the gap created by a lack of knowledge and understanding. FHIR, which stands for Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources, is a draft standard from HL7 International. This standard is designed to be easier to implement, more open and more extensible than its predecessors, V2 and V3 standards. So what’s the big deal here? Aren’t we simply replacing one transport protocol with another? FHIR claims to bring a change in paradigm to the way health information can be accessed and consumed. Since FHIR is ...